Started watching
Jesus' Son on Hulu last night, and had to stop, take time out for reflection, about a half or two thirds of the way through (still haven't resumed this morning); because, for all its grinding, unreflecting,
troppo serioso heterosexuality and the use of hard drugs taken by hypodermic injection (which I was
never into), this is a movie about
me. And my friends. FH and I are pretty much the same person--even, in 1971, looking alike, except that I was a tad leaner and more muscular (no tummy whatsoever), with blond-streaked auburn hair, rather than black. But
pretty,
as we all mostly were then, and as the movie suggests, attractive to women, by whom sometimes, mostly out of vanity, I allowed myself to be seduced. And when pregnancy resulted, as once or twice it did, I made it clear to the Expectant One: "I'll support you both for the first two years of the kid's life. And after that I will support the kid till he's eighteen, but not you." For some reason, this generous, explicit offer of mine was never accepted, and the gravid ladies always got abortions within the first trimester. Maybe it had something to do with my inability even to imagine the child-to-be as anything but a boy. I think I'd have been a fine father for a boy, but I wouldn't have known what to do with a girl, for sure.
3 Comments:
As with your other posts, I’m grateful for this, not least for its leading me to Roger Ebert’s review of the movie, in which he remarks, “Like all good films, it is not for everybody (only bad films are for everybody).” It is certainly not for me. And the virtue of excellent prose, especially in the short pieces of a blog, is to sometimes stay in the memory, or even the subconscious, long after reading them, though they describe a life one could never live, is devoid of envy to live; yet finds oneself enriched undefinably by the vicarious experience.
Thank you, Vincent, for calling my prose excellent, but seriously, as I hope you see, my aim is spontaneity, honesty, truthfulness. Think of Sam. Pepys, not Pliny the Younger. It freezes my heart to think of my blog as literature.
Good, you challenged my pompus euphemism. To me, spontaneity, honesty and truthfulness are what I look for in literature, along with craft, which in a certain kind of writer, doubtless Pepys and yourself included, has become largely unconscious. I admired your piece “My first time . . .” but tiptoed through a perceived minefield of taboo. It was surely craft, whether deliberate, unconscious or serendipitous, to retell it in a frame of multiple transgressions and risks, the sweetness of stolen fruit, etc. In any event it had impact upon this “straight” reader.
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home