WHO the bloody hell appointed Judy Clarke as Dzhokhar Tsarnov's "Defense" Attorney?

And why, despite his pleading NOT GUILTY, did the venal bitch totally ADMIT his guilt in her final summation to the jury--as if it were a given and incontestable?   Guilt, I might add, for which not an iota of actual proof or substantiation was given during the trial.  If I had known how utterly without pretense of giving him a fair trial these proceedings were going to be, I'd have found a way to to get  MYSELF appointed as Tsarnov's defense attorney.  Surely a miscarriage of justice as blatant, and as obviously politically motivated, as this can be declared a MISTRIAL.  If not, then, O my pure-souled revolutionary activists of good conscience, it is time for the cleansing Couteau de Corday--beginning, I should think, with Ms. Clarke.