I'll bet that they know over at Salon Magazine, or imagine (being the imaginary sex they are) that they do. When you read a description, or an attempted definition of "Sex Trafficking," with its implicit positing of utterly will-less prostitutes engaged, apparently, only by coercion of threats and physical violence, in utterly involuntary acts, you wonder if what is meant is not, rather, Bestiality Trafficking. I remember that brief while in my life when I was a whore (preferring young, fit policemen as clients), and I encountered female prostitutes, from whom I learned of the existence of pimps: I would ask the ladies, "What do you need him for?" And they all, with no exceptions that I recall, answered, "For emotional security." And to the question of "What the fuck is 'Emotional Security'?" there was never, ever, an answer--or maybe just not one that I understood.
And what do I mean by "imaginary sex"? Well, what does the word "orgasm" mean? Or "rape"? Or "enjoyment of the passive rĂ´le in anal sex"? It depends, really, on whether you're asking a real or an imaginary person--a man or a woman.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home