Friday, May 29, 2009

Reading Heidegger....Well, reading Wrathall's Translation,

Though still shuddering away in aversive horror from the oncosis of Heidegger's actual utterance, I'm finding that I concur with everything that Wrathall says Heidegger said.  With some reservations (two so far):  (1) I am not entirely persuaded that locality is the only fundamental characteristic of isness; and (2) theoretically, as an essentialist, atomic American Transcendentalist, and experientially, as the gay outsider, and lifelong tester and defier of the world's normative limits, I don't attach the same importance or acknowledge the same finality to the world's limitations of my "authenticity."  I would, for example, have found it much easier not to be a Nazi than Heidegger did.

Tuesday, May 26, 2009


'Tis said that towards the end of our life we take a renewed interest in obituaries and in tending our ancestral graves. Prompted by some such morbid inclination, I've been going over the list of the names of the 701 souls interred in the "Lamont" town cemetery--A small enough number, but huge considering that I recognize, and can put a face to nearly a quarter or a third of all the names.

Saddest and bitterest, him whom I last remember at twelve years of age, standing naked with me and my brother, aged eleven and thirteen, in a tepid waterfall of Willow Creek, a mile or so downstream from my grandfather's farm at Pampa, under a brilliant end-of-June sun--a brilliant, quizzical, laughing boy, the spitting image of his sharp, quizzical father, Frank Gordon: "Gordon, Timothy T, 'Tim' 1944 - 1965." I had heard that he'd drowned in a boating-accident, while fishing in Alaska. I envision Frank spelling out the inscription--with its little joke, typical dad-humour, just between themselves--"That's 'T' for nothing, 'T' for Timothy, my son Tim."

But how many in this world, even in the ancestor-worshipping East, can point to a corner of the earth where the remains of so many of his kith and kin are buried, as I can in the 'Lamont' "perpetual care" cemetery? There are both of my parents, my older brother (who died in childbirth a year before I was born), all four of my grandparents, and even a great-grandfather and great-grandmother (my mother's mother's father and mother)--and many, many cousins, aunts, uncles, second and third cousins, and not a few great-aunts and uncles. Was I, am I, the nexus of so many lives? I feel like a one man road-show of Our Town.

Speaking of great-grandparents, I had been looking all over for the graves of my great-grandfather and great-grandmother Moses and Ellen Moore--I had assumed they must have been buried near Dayton, because that's where they settled, and where, when I was a boy, we would travel to visit their many children and grand-children...but Lo! here they are in the 'Lamont' cemetery, together with most of their progeny. But now a mystery arises: According to the stories my grandmother told me, her father and mother had fled from what is now West Virginia just before the Civil War. But if they did, they could not have been older than seventeen or eighteen, and nine, years old, respectively. The Civil War began in April, 1861; and according to the dates on the gravestones, Moses Moore was born in 1843, his wife Ellen in 1852. Another, indistinct-as-to-source memory tells me that Great-grandmother Ellen Moore was thirteen when she married Moses (he being a cradle-robbing twenty-four or twenty-five years old)--1865. So, they "fled" most likely just after the Civil War ended. This puts a whole new complexion on their status as war refugees. I've seen the tax record for Moses Moore in 1866 or 1867 in the Washington Territory; he was assessed at (as I recall) some $1,250 worth of property; which might have been $18,000 in modern money, or it might have been ten times that. At any rate, he was not poor--not nearly so poor as a man fleeing the devastation of war, who had just put all his assets into a wagon train, should have been.

And the important, the valuable, the precious thing about great-grandfather Moses Moore was that he didn't act poor. Several different things that I know about him confirm this:

item -- related by my mother: "He and his family were hospitable to a agree unknown and unheard of in those days, in this part of the world. Whenever a caller or a visitor appeared, whatever work was being done--even field-work--would be abandoned, tools thrown down, while the visitor was greeted and 'entertained.' People came to spend the night, and wound up staying for weeks. And when a caller departed, Grandfather Moses would invariably walk with them clear to the end of the lane [rural Westernism for drive-way]."

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

Domani alla Biblioteca

Being held at the checkout desk for me are: Mark Wrathall's How to read Heidegger; Peter Watson's Twins : an uncanny relationship, and Psychology and race: John Montgomery's How to read Mayan hieroglyphs.  In transit are: Watson's Ideas : a history of thought and invention, from fire to Freud, and The modern mind : an intellectual history of the 20th century.  The only thing I'm really looking forward to with unalloyed delight is How to read Mayan hieroglyphs--knowing that they aren't really hieroglyphs at all, but a phonetic syllabary, which is a much more sophisticated and interesting thing.

Saturday, May 16, 2009



Phil and I had a long, lovely chat this morning--evening already for him--covering our usual shoes-to-sealing wax agenda:  The Pope and his new red slippers, how many German women read the novels of Yukio Mishima, wunderschönen Monat Mai, Heidegger and The Book of Tea (I had to tell him); but most of all we talked about Così Fan Tutte:  He and Corinna had just seen a fine performance of it at the Cologne opera house last night--and he was full of it.  We talked about what a wonderful librettist Da Ponte was; how important it is to do Così "straight":  Period sets and costumes (and these must be beautiful and extravagant), and young, strong, good-looking singers for the four principals.  We touched on how "transporting" is "Soave sia il Vento," and I ventured the observation that one of the things that makes the disguises of Ferrando, Guglielmo, and Despina half-way believable is distance-between-persons accepted as a given in the Siècle des Lumières....I wonder if I meant that.